Marriot and Body Shop Aims and Objectives Essay Example for Free

Marriot and Body Shop Aims and Objectives Essay introduction Marriot is an international brand however the purpose of this controlled assessment, they will be my local business known as London Heathrow Marriott-LHM. Marriott is currently a private limited company (PLC) and has two other private investors as owners of the company. The Marriott hotel was founded in 1993 and is located in Harlington, Hayes. Currently its labour turnover for the month of September (2010) is an increase of 10.1%. Marriott acquires approximately 133,000 employee’s world wide and between 8,000-9,000 employees in the UK. My other local business is The Body shop. The Body Shop is an international business Definition of Aims The long-term goals a business wants to achieve. Goals that a business wants to achieve to be successful. Explain what aims are Definition of objectives The specific steps taken by a business to achieve a goal Objectives have to S.M.A.R.T, this stands for: * Specific * Measurable * Achievable * Realistic * Time Marriott’s aims * Guest Satisfaction Superiority * Marriott Profitability Owner Return on Investment * Associate Satisfaction Marriott’s objectives * GSS (Customer Target) 75% (satisfied with overall service) * Sales turnover of  £20m per annum * Labour turnover less than or equal to 25% Summarising Marriott’s aims and objectives Marriot have set themselves three aims that they hope to achieve. These three aims vary from making a profit on their investment to guest and employee satisfaction. Marriott’s first aim and objective focuses on customer satisfaction. They are going to meet this goal by being customer focused and meeting customer needs. To achieve this they will do everything in their power to keep their customers happy to give recommendations to other people and for them to keep coming back to their hotel. They need to deliver the â€Å"wow factor† by providing the best quality of service. They intend to meet this aim by encouraging their guests to complete a â€Å"Guest Satisfaction Survey†. To achieve their aim they need 75% of their customers to be satisfied. The management team reviews all these surveys to find out what they need to improve on to make the hotel and make it the best in the industry. They also focus on associate satisfaction which focuses on the employees. They are striving for labour turnover less than or equal to 25% therefore Marriott hope not to lose more than 1 in 4 of their employees. They aim to make employees satisfied by ensuring their staff is happy. They will achieve this aim by motivating their staff and rewarding them with staff benefits for example LHM offer â€Å"Valuable room rate, food and beverage, and retail discounts at global Marriott locations.† This gives the employees the feeling that Marriott cares about them. Also the amount of pay that is offered by Marriott is higher than most equivalent jobs. This makes the employees want to stay as they know that there is a very slim chance that they will find this amount of pay anywhere else, or they may not get the same amount of bonuses-motivating them to do better- The want the communication between the staff and Marriott management to be strong as this gives the employees the sense that they are involved within the business. Their third aim and objective focuses on Income and money made. Marriott want to make a profit and have a sales turnover of  £20m per annum. By doing this they will be able to maintain share prices and reward shareholders with dividends. Furthermore they will be able to do this by increasing sales revenue for this hotel. This has been set out by the management senior Marriott personnel in the US. The will achieve this by providing the best quality of service. body shopAims * Leading business in the beauty industry * Fair trade * Protect human rights – customers and staff * Protect the Environment and planet body shop objectives * Continue to grow by maximizing sales * All our suppliers have signed the Code of conduct supporting ethical, fair trade program. * Improving working conditions for body shop employees and protecting their Human rights * Every product packaging is made from 100% recycled materials Summary of the body shop aims and objectives

Is Jesus A Socialist - The Jun :: essays research papers

The Jungle – Is Jesus a Socialist?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  There are many interpretations that different individuals can develop on one event, material, or thing, and on such example is the Bible. In The Jungle, Upton Sinclair, an advocate of Socialism, uses a character to tie Socialism with Jesus. The character is an â€Å"ex-preacher,† called Lucas, who portrays Jesus as a Socialist by using his actions and words to conform with Socialist ideas. Although one cannot say interpretations are right or wrong, Sinclair blasphemously uses the Bible for his own ideas.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In the beginning of Lucas’s speech on Jesus he says that Jesus was a man â€Å"whose whole being was one flame of hatred for wealth, and all that wealth stands† (Sinclair 334). There are examples in the Bible that might lead one to infer that Jesus was a hater of wealth, but he didn’t. In fact, he dined at many wealthy individuals’ houses, i.e. â€Å"Jesus at a Pharisee’s House† (Luke 14:1-24). If he hated the rich and â€Å"well to do† he would not even associate with them. Jesus only disliked the many lavish things that rich people did with their wealth, which blocked their relationship with God. For example, in Luke 16:19-31 there is a story about a rich man and Lazarus, a beggar covered with boils. The rich man did not help Lazarus one bit, even though Lazarus’s condition was so bad, being covered in sores, that â€Å"even the dogs came and licked his sores† (Luke 16:21). The rich man daily â€Å" was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day† (Luke 16:19), but would not spare some food for Lazarus who â€Å"[longed] to eat what fell from the rich man’s table† (Luke 16:21). Eventually both Lazarus and the rich man died, Lazarus was received into Heaven, and Lazarus fell into hell. The rich man suffering in hell saw Abraham with Lazarus far away, and called out, â€Å"Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire† (Luke 16:24). But Father Abraham replied, â€Å"Son remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony† (Luke 16:24). Jesus showed others that the rich man ignored God’s will by indulging himself in his wealth, and failed to receive eternal life by ignoring the simplistic need of Lazarus. Is Jesus A Socialist - The Jun :: essays research papers The Jungle – Is Jesus a Socialist?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  There are many interpretations that different individuals can develop on one event, material, or thing, and on such example is the Bible. In The Jungle, Upton Sinclair, an advocate of Socialism, uses a character to tie Socialism with Jesus. The character is an â€Å"ex-preacher,† called Lucas, who portrays Jesus as a Socialist by using his actions and words to conform with Socialist ideas. Although one cannot say interpretations are right or wrong, Sinclair blasphemously uses the Bible for his own ideas.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In the beginning of Lucas’s speech on Jesus he says that Jesus was a man â€Å"whose whole being was one flame of hatred for wealth, and all that wealth stands† (Sinclair 334). There are examples in the Bible that might lead one to infer that Jesus was a hater of wealth, but he didn’t. In fact, he dined at many wealthy individuals’ houses, i.e. â€Å"Jesus at a Pharisee’s House† (Luke 14:1-24). If he hated the rich and â€Å"well to do† he would not even associate with them. Jesus only disliked the many lavish things that rich people did with their wealth, which blocked their relationship with God. For example, in Luke 16:19-31 there is a story about a rich man and Lazarus, a beggar covered with boils. The rich man did not help Lazarus one bit, even though Lazarus’s condition was so bad, being covered in sores, that â€Å"even the dogs came and licked his sores† (Luke 16:21). The rich man daily â€Å" was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day† (Luke 16:19), but would not spare some food for Lazarus who â€Å"[longed] to eat what fell from the rich man’s table† (Luke 16:21). Eventually both Lazarus and the rich man died, Lazarus was received into Heaven, and Lazarus fell into hell. The rich man suffering in hell saw Abraham with Lazarus far away, and called out, â€Å"Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire† (Luke 16:24). But Father Abraham replied, â€Å"Son remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony† (Luke 16:24). Jesus showed others that the rich man ignored God’s will by indulging himself in his wealth, and failed to receive eternal life by ignoring the simplistic need of Lazarus.

Cities and urban life Essay

In any developing and developed countries, one of the indicators of development is the infrastructure and the growth of cities. Urban culture is the cultural behavior that is associated with the urbanites. Cities all over the world, from the time immemorial have behaviors and cultural elements that separate them from otherwise specific comparable rural areas. In the developed countries, the word urban is solemnly used as a euphemism to describe dot com culture or subsets of racial culture, and this forms a defined groups as a type of urban tribe. Therefore, names for cultural artifacts like urban loud music could be seen as a new term for certain class music. It can also refer to the greater availability of cultural resources such as art, theatre, events, etc as compared to suburban or rural areas. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Impacts of urban life In summary, the author ventures on the advantages and disadvantages of urban life as compared to rural life. Here, there arises a query as to why the rich or the affluent prefer living in major cities. Moreover, the poor are associated with the rural life. Some of the advantages of urban life include availability of basic human needs in varieties. There is cheap and ready means of transport in urban areas as opposed to rural areas. Availabilities of reputable health facilities. In rural areas, one has to travel miles away to access health facilities, market, higher institution of learning etc. Contrary to that, some of the weaknesses associated with urban life include congestion due to over population, concurrent crime activities, pollution to water, air and environment at large, due to wreck less dumping of refuses, polythene bags and tins. Slums are another menace associated with urban life. In every large city, there must be a slum nearby. Conclusion From other disciplines perspective, the author introduces a disciplinary analyses and contested accounts of tourism and urban culture from geographical, historical, sociological, anthropological and economical point of view. Finally, there are some developments in subject field analyses from urban and planning studies, Cultural and leisure studies, Gender and queer studies. Reference: Cities and urban life, retrieved on 22sd September 2007, available at www. amazon. com/ Nancy Kleniewski (2004), A Political Economy of Urban Life, retrieved on 22sd September 2007, Longman, U. K

Regulation of Prostitution - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 994 Downloads: 7 Date added: 2019/07/31 Category Society Essay Level High school Tags: Prostitution Essay Did you like this example? Prostitution is known as the oldest profession in the world. It has been recorded vastly throughout history, dating as back as the Ancient Near East. Data gathered by historians evidences how there were multiple temples which were dedicated to different gods and goddesses. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Regulation of Prostitution" essay for you Create order In these places, sacred prostitution occurred regularly. Throughout most of modern history, the practice of prostitution is commonly perceived as a taboo subject as it is surrounded by stigmatization. Countries around the globe, in the past, have attempted to eradicate the practice by marginalizing and criminalizing those whom are sex workers. Throughout the nineteenth century prostitution in Italy faced a tumultuous path, with laws in its favor and laws against it. Several people in high power positions shunned prostitution and thought of it as a crime and, therefore, treated as one; Meanwhile, other leaders agreed that the best solution to contain it was to legally regulate it. In the early nineteenth century, prostitution was prohibited in Rome by Pope Pius IX, who deemed it a sin and, consequently, a crime. The act of committing this immorality was punishable in a brutal manner: such as imprisonment, fines, torture and various types of harassment but, the way the authorities enforced the regulation was labeled inconsistent and ineffective. Despite the active efforts of eradicating the sex trade, women still publicly continued their services in street corners and in brothels in Rome. Other cities, such as Palermo, enforced laws inspired by the regulation the French had implemented. In Palermo, the license of toleration was carried out; this required prostitutes to receive medical examinations for any venereal disease. This regulation failed as well, given that various health officials and policemen would turn a blind eye to the rising numbers of unapproved prostitutes. Infected prostitutes were sent to special hospitals, that were inefficient when containi ng the diseases. The spread of venereal diseases was a fear, among the Italian society, that spread like wildfire. Prostitutes represented a symbol in the Italian middle-high class society that overlapped with several marginal groups-the idle poor, the criminal, the sexual deviant, and the woman-in one figure. Women were oppressed even if they came from rich backgrounds, but when a woman did not fit the criteria of daughter, mother, or wife they were shunned. Given that prostitutes were usually promiscuous and single they were even more excluded. Italys society believed that not only were prostitutes part of the lowest ranks in society but, they had close relationships to criminals, which inadvertently made them criminals as well. One of the reasons why prostitutes were marginalized and compared to the lowest of society was because nineteenth century individuals condemned extramarital sex. This was represented in the periods literature, which in turn classified them as sexual deviants. All previous efforts of containing the spread of venereal diseases failed. Therefore when Camillo Benso di Cavour (the first Prime Minister of the kingdom of Italy) he implemented what is known as the Cavour Law in 1860. Cavour legalized prostitution with strict controls. To protect the Italian people he established laws that demanded that prostitutes individually register with the police, receive medical examinations twice a week, and check into Health Offices or special hospitasl, the sifilicomi, if infected. There legal status was altered from criminals to deviants. The regulation that was implemented insured that prostitutes would have freedom from the criminal world to a certain extent. The supporters of regulations believed that brothels harbored violence and crime. Therefore to separate these two ideas they banned any sort of entertainment that involved drinking. Also, police had the power to conduct random inspections of the brothels; this way any criminal could be apprehende d easily. The Cavour Law also required the owners of brothels to pay for many of the prostitutes necessities: clothes, linen and their examinations. Although the regulation highlighted that its laws were to protect the italian people and prostitutes, most of the laws were extremely oppressive and degrading. Prostitutes had several rules they had to follow, the inability to follow them could get them incarcerated. Some of the strict laws were that they must not be seen through the windows of their closed houses, they must not solicit in public areas, they needed to have a valid reason to be outside of their brothel during the night, among other laws. One of the laws that was considered the most humiliating was vaginal examination; even though they were for medical purpose, it was considered an invasion of privacy and extremely degrading. Both regulationists and abolitionists believed in the modesty of a woman representing their personal dignity, the honor of the family, and the moral poetry of the nation. Abolitionists was a group of individuals who rose from the movement which opposed the Cavour regulation. Their wish was to abolish regulation and, instead, decriminalize the private act of prostitution. This new movement created challenges for the previously established Cavour regulation. The abolitionists believed that the fundamental ideal when forming a legislation was freedom. They quickly rejected the regulations oppressive nature and demanded change. In 1876, the parliament of Italy changed from a Liberal Right into a Left. Abolitionists expected a expeditious legislative reform but, this reform came bit by bit through the approval of laws that altered, not repealed, the original regulation. The first step to reform came in 1888 this was named the Crispi Regulation. It remained similar to the Cavour Regulation, changing laws in order to decrease the control policemen and doctors had over prostitutes. One of the most important sections of this regulation was the abolition of the Health Offices and sifilicomi. With this new law, the authorities could no longer force prostitutes to undergo vaginal examinations, infected women had to admit themselves voluntarily. The government promised to establish new clinics that would serve both female and male patients for venereal diseases. This signaled a change in the perception as now they did not believe that prostitutes were the only source of the disease, all italian population were cons idered possible carriers